Only the most recent motherboards seem to have Core 2 support, so you’ll want to check carefully with the motherboard maker before assuming a board is compatible. In fact, the Core 2 can act as a drop-in replacement for a Pentium D or Pentium Extreme Edition, provided that the motherboard is capable of supplying the lower voltages that Core 2 processors require.
INTEL CORE 2 DUO 2.4 GHZ BENCHMARK SERIES
NVIDIA’s nForce4 SLI X16 Intel Edition should work, too, as well as the yet-to-be-released nForce 500 series for Intel. The processors should be compatible with a number of chipsets, including the enthusiast-class 975X and the upcoming 965-series mainstream chipsets from Intel. On a brighter note, the supporting infrastructure for Core 2 chips is already fairly well established. They aren’t expected to be available until the fourth quarter of this year. The less expensive versions of the Core 2 Duo with 2MB of L2 cache are initial casualties of this controlled ramp. I wouldn’t be surprised to see strong demand and short supply of these processors for the next couple of months, until Intel is able to ramp up production volumes. Intel will be transitioning its CPU production gradually away from Pentiums to Core 2 Duos, and that transition might not happen as quickly as the market would like.
INTEL CORE 2 DUO 2.4 GHZ BENCHMARK PC
Intel says complete PC systems based on the Core 2 Extreme X6800 and individually boxed products will both begin selling on July 27th, while Core 2 Duo processors with 4MB of L2 cache should show up on August 7th. The fastest Core 2 processor is the X6800 Extreme, which is separated from the regular Core 2 Duos only by its 2.93GHz clock speed and a 10W higher TDPoh, and by almost half a grand. Clock speeds are down, as well, since the Core microarchitecture focuses on achieving high performance per clock rather than stratospheric clock frequencies. This parameterthermal design powerspecifies the amount of cooling the chip requires, and the numbers are down dramatically from the Pentium Extreme Edition 965’s rating of 130W. What you’ll really want to notice about the Core 2 chips, though, is the column labeled TDP. The prices on the mid-range models are quite reasonable once you consider performance, as we’ll do shortly. Like them, it resides in an LGA775-style socket and runs on a 1066MHz front-side bus. In spite of all the hype, the Core 2 Duo processor itself is a rather unassuming bloke that looks no different than Pentium CPUs that preceeded it. We first previewed the chip code-named Conroe back in March, and now we finally have our hands on one within the confines of our own labs. Intel has recovered its stride, returned to its winning ways, gotten its groove back, and put the izzle back in its shizzle. After many hours of testing, we’re pleased to report that the Core 2 chips live up to the hype. Fish have gotta swim, politicians have gotta dissemble, and TR has gotta test hardware, so of course we’ve had the Core 2 processors on the test bench here in Damage Labs for a thorough workout against AMD’s finestincluding the new Energy Efficient versions of the Athlon 64 X2. Intel has decided to take the wraps off final reviews of its new CPUs today, in anticipation of the chips’ release to the public in a couple of weeks. Clearly, when a player as big as Intel stumbles as badly as it has, PC enthusiasts and most others in the industry are keen to see it get back up and start delivering exciting products once again.įortunately, the wait for Core 2 processors is almost over.
We’ve been knee-deep in hype about the Core architecture for months now, with a stream of juicy technical details, semi-official benchmark previews, and clandestine reviews of pre-release products feeding the anticipation. The product of that team’s efforts is a new CPU microarchitecture known as Core, of which the Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme are among the first implementations intended for desktop PCs. As a result, Intel decided to scrap Netburst and bet the farm on a new high-performance, low-power design from the Israel-based design team responsible for the Pentium M. Despite heroic efforts by Intel’s engineering and manufacturing types, these chips based on the Netburst microarchitecture haven’t been able to overcome their inherent limitations well enough to keep up with the Athlon 64. In other words, they’ve been hotter than Jessica Simpson and slower than, well, Jessica Simpson.
They’ve also drawn a tremendous amount of power, which they’ve generously expended as heat. Pentium 4 and Pentium D CPUs have run at relatively high clock speeds but delivered relatively low performance compared to their competition from AMD. I NTEL’S DESKTOP PROCESSORS HAVE NOT been in a good place for the past two and a half years.
0 kommentar(er)
